Sunday, May 26, 2019

A Review of Saint Augustine’s Virtue and the Human Soul Essay

In Augustines name Virtue and the Hu hu parts Soul, happiness is discussed in great detail. What makes a man happy? How do we declare this happiness and where does happiness reside? Can this happiness be lost? Augustine answers these questions by the notion of singles headland good. He explains that a mans headspring good is the reason behind all happiness. If one is not happy, it is because they have not bring their caput good, and therefore thunder mugnot be happy until they find it (Augustine 264-267).Happiness is in the enjoyment of mans old-timer good. Two conditions of the chief good 1st, Nothing is unwrap than it 2nd, it cannot be lost against the will (Augustine 264-267). As human beings, we all want to be happy and live enjoyable lives. However, Augustine believes that only one type of person can fully achieve happiness, the man who both loves and possesses their chief good (Augustine 264-267). He describes three other cases when happiness is not obtained. First, one who seeks what he cannot obtain suffers torture (Augustine 264-267). This means that someone who strives for something that they will never be able to reach is not happy. Secondly, one who has got what is not desirable is cheated (Augustine 264-267). This is saying that someone who has legitimate happiness in a way that they do not like, or has received happiness that they do not want, can never be happy. Thirdly, one who does not seek for what is worth seeking for is diseased (Augustine 264-267). This final case is when someone seeks happiness through things that are wrong and not worth having. In all of these three mentioned cases, ones chief good has not been found.Augustine continues in the article by discussing how mans chief good is not inferior to man itself, but more as an equal to man. The chief good then must be something that is never lost against the will (Augustine 264-267). The chief good, once properly in the heart of a man, can never be taken away. It resides fu lly in the inner workings of man and is bury so deep within that nothing could ever take away the happiness. For no one can feel confident regarding a good which he knows can be taken from him, although he wishes to keep and cherish it. But if a man feels no confidence regarding the good which he enjoys, how can he be happy while in such fear of losing it? (Augustine 264-267).For example, when you go to a pet shop and see all the cute puppies. You want to hold them and pet them, and it makes you so happy for that brief period. However, you know that the happiness can be taken away from you, because you dont bear the puppies, you dont get to take them home. Ultimately, you walk away sad, and wishing you could hold on to that happiness just a little longer. It is hard to be confident in a happiness that you know can be taken away from you at whatsoever time, and its equally as hard to have no confidence in your happiness because you live in fear of never being happy.Augustine cont inues his discussion of what makes a man. The question lies in the discussion between man being of the body only, of the somebody only, or both. He talks about this to determine where mans chief good resides, and from where it is discovered. Mans chief good is not the chief good of the body only, but the chief good of the soul (Augustine 264-267). Augustine states that a persons chief good is found in the soul and that the soul gives life history to the body. The soul provides bodily pleasure, pain, strength, beauty, swiftness, etc. Without the soul, there would be no body, and without the body, no soul. They work together in direct to achieve the chief good for man.Augustine gives the example of a coachman who works for him. The coachman does the most satisfactory job of caring for the horses, all because Augustine has provided the funds and bounty to the coachman. Can any one deny that the good condition of the horses is due to Augustine? (Augustine 264-267). His point is that w ithout his money and horses, the coachman would never be able to do the job he was assigned, and because of Augustine in this example, the coachman can provide the happiness and care to the horses. This relates to the body being a direct worker of the soul. The body is the outward laborer of the souls control.Augustines article is summed up in the discussion of virtue. Virtue gives perfection to the soul the soul obtains virtue by following beau ideal following God is the happy life (Augustine 264-267). Augustine debates whether or not virtue exists on its own, or if it can only exist within the soul. He says virtue must exist on its own because the soul must have something to follow after in order to attain that virtue. Virtue must be gained it is not already contained within the soul. This virtue, fit in to Augustine, belongs in the followers of God. As mentioned before, Augustine believes that ones chief good cannot be taken away against ones will. Therefore, it must remain th at God is the virtue one seeks. Through following God, ones chief good, happiness, and virtue can be both loved and possessed (Augustine 264-267).After read and re-reading this article, I feel I have finally found the true meaning of what Saint Augustine was saying. Happiness cannot just be attained by the go bad of a finger, by a simple glimpse of hope. Happiness must be sought after in a way that completely fills the soul and in a way that one can feel they are completely confident in their happiness. I agree with Augustines argument for the pursuit of God in finding happiness. I believe that God is the creator of happiness and virtue, and that through him anyone can find their chief good. My question to the class is this do you agree with Augustines argument of happiness only coming from within the soul and God, or do you believe happiness can be obtained to its fullest potential drop in a different way?Work CitedAugustine, Saint. Virtue and the Human Soul. Vice and Virtue In Everyday Life. Comp. Christina Hoff Sommers and Fred Sommers. Belmont, CA Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.